Available for viewing are a total of
The State of Nevada vs Raven Queen
May 14, 2024, 46 seconds
Presiding
The Honorable Carli Kierny, Eighth Judicial District Court, Department 2, presiding over a hearing on custody status. Appearing for the State is Chief Deputy District Attorney Kenneth Portz. Appearing for Ms. Queen is Defense Attorneys Thomas Ericsson and Lance Maningo. Case No. C-23-371483-1. The Court continues. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
Sciscento: Las Vegas Justice Court, Department 2
May 8, 2024, 23 minutes, 32 seconds
Interviewee
Justice of the Peace Joe Sciscento joins special host Joe Gersten for a discussion on his candidacy for Department 2 of the Las Vegas Justice Court. The views and opinions of any candidates running for judicial office are their own. As a policy, Our Nevada Judges ensures all judicial candidates are extended an invitation. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
Maxey: Eighth Judicial District Court, Department N
May 8, 2024, 22 minutes, 55 seconds
Interviewee
Host
Deputy Public Defender Kerri Maxey joins host Emily McFarling for a discussion on her candidacy for Department N of the Family Division of the Eighth Judicial District Court. The views and opinions of any candidates running for judicial office are their own. As a policy, Our Nevada Judges ensures all judicial candidates are extended an invitation. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
Gaudet: Eighth Judicial District Court, Department N
May 8, 2024, 34 minutes, 31 seconds
Interviewee
District Court Judge Paul Gaudet joins hosts Ben Bateman and John Stiles for a discussion on his candidacy for Department N of the Family Division of the Eighth Judicial District Court. The views and opinions of any candidates running for judicial office are their own. As a policy, Our Nevada Judges ensures all judicial candidates are extended an invitation. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
Canady: Las Vegas Municipal Court, Department 5
10 minutes, 23 seconds
Interviewee
Rae Canady is a dynamic and compassionate lawyer with a background in social work, bringing a unique blend of legal expertise and a deep understanding of community needs to the forefront of her campaign for Municipal Court judge in Las Vegas, Department 5. With a commitment to justice and fairness, Rae aims to address key issues within the court system, advocating for innovative solutions to improve access to justice and support for vulnerable populations. Her passion for serving the community shines through in her advocacy for reminders for court appearances, recognizing the potential to prevent unnecessary hardships for defendants and alleviate burdens on the justice system. As a candidate, Rae embodies integrity, empathy, and a relentless dedication to ensuring equal treatment under the law for all residents of Las Vegas. #RaeCanady #LasVegasJudge #CommunityAdvocate #LegalExpert #SocialJustice #MunicipalCourt #AccessToJustice #EqualityUnderTheLaw #EmpathyInLaw #VoteRaeCanady #thepulse #sarahobal #sambuban
The State of Nevada vs Meta, Part 2
May 10, 2024, 1 hour, 56 minutes, 19 seconds
Presiding
The Honorable Joanna Kishner, Eighth Judicial District Court, Department 31, presiding over a motion hearing. Attorney Michael Gayan for the State. Attorneys Timothy Hester and Tammy Paterson for Meta Platforms Inc. Case No. A-24-886110-B. The Court disposes multiple motions. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
The State of Nevada vs Meta, Part 1
May 10, 2024, 1 hour, 37 minutes, 38 seconds
Presiding
The Honorable Joanna Kishner, Eighth Judicial District Court, Department 31, presiding over a motion hearing. Attorney Michael Gayan for the State. Attorneys Timothy Hester and Tammy Paterson for Meta Platforms Inc. Case No. A-24-886110-B. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
D.H., a Mother vs J.H., a Father
May 9, 2024, 12 minutes, 4 seconds
Presiding
The Honorable Stephanie Charter, Eighth Judicial District Court, Department Y, Family Division, presiding over an emergency hearing. Attorney Erick Ferran for the Mother. Attorney Kerry Faughnan for the Father. The Court declines to take action, defers to pending evidentiary hearing. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
L.N., a Mother vs C.G., a Father
Apr 30, 2024, 12 minutes, 1 second
Presiding
The Honorable Bryce Duckworth, Eighth Judicial District Court, Department Q, Family Division, presiding over a hearing on motion for stay. Attorney Shannon Wilson appeared on behalf of the Mother. Attorney Michael Burton appeared on behalf of the Father. The Court conditionally grants motion. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
The State of Nevada vs Charles Dowling
Mar 14, 2024, 33 minutes, 4 seconds
Presiding
Senior Judge Kathleen Delaney, Eighth Judicial District Court, presiding over a hearing on entry of plea. Chief Deputy District Attorney Michael Dickerson appeared on behalf of the State. Defense Attorney Philip Singer appeared on behalf of Mr. Dowling. Case No. C-23-375275-1. The Court accepts guilty plea. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
The State of Nevada vs Roger Hillygus
May 8, 2024, 2 minutes, 17 seconds
Presiding
The Honorable Tom Perkins, Dayton Justice Court, presiding over a bench trial. Appearing for the State is Deputy District Attorney Carmala Reed. Mr. Hillygus is representing himself. Case No. 21TR977. The State's witness fails to appear, motion to continue denied, the Court dismisses charges without prejudice. You can join as a member by clicking this link here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJPb0hCUcufpuk7QhxVxwKA/join For inquiries, feel free to contact us through www.ournevadajudges.com
Pat: An Unpersuasive Brief
24 minutes, 11 seconds
Jose “Chille” DeCastro just filed his appellate brief on 5/6/24. It was timely under the 40 day “Fast-Track” appellate rules. I was unpersuaded by this brief. Procedurally (and I’m not a Nevada lawyer) the appellate rules limit briefs to 16 pages, not 31. It's possible they either violated the rule or have permission from a different rule I am not aware of. There are also requirements that must be addressed separately, such as grounds for jurisdiction, errors at the trial court that warrant scrutiny, etc. I didn’t see any of that specifically listed. There were typographical errors, and attempts to creatively abstract this case to the George Floyd murder and to racism. None of this was addressed at trial, and isn’t part of the record. Instead of a focused brief on the narrow issues of statutory interpretation, it was skimmed over. The manner in which the brief was written failed to grab my attention and persuade me. The brief took a very risky approach, and heavily criticized Judge Zimmerman, and threw Michael Mee “under the bus.” Take great caution in how you attack a judge, and if you take such a bold move, be sure you are right. Many justices/judges will view such an attempt as the last refuge of legally dead arguments. The brief also contained a robotic style of writing. I deleted clauses and revised sentences for clarity. This was my "Delete Clawz" satire. I didn’t see the how the brief could rely very heavily on First Circuit authority, when we are in the Ninth Circuit, and point to law review articles, which are pretty much ignored by California lawyers. Maybe this is a different in Nevada? None of this legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is expressed, implied and is flatly rejected. I am not licensed in Nevada, and am not offering any legal advice in that state. I am merely commenting on a public issue. This is for entertainment only. I reserve all rights, including California's anti-SLAPP laws. I am not suggesting or inferring that anyone committed malpractice or violated any standard of care. This video is just my personal reaction. There can be legitimate and strategic reasons persons or lawyers took the actions that they did, and not as a result of some error.
©2026 Our Nevada Judges, Inc.
Terms & ConditionsVersion: 5.0.1Privacy Policy
An NRS Chapter 82 non-profit corporation. Recognized by the IRS as a Section 501(c)(3) organization.
